Using Video Technology with Flipped Teaching to Explore University Students’ Perception of Their SRL and Instructors’ TPACK

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/jptpd.v2i1.961Keywords:
Flipped Classrooms, Self-Regulated Learning, Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge, TPACK, Video TechnologyAbstract
This study determines how the use of videos and a blended flipped class model at a university affects university students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) and the instructor’s technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The proposed flipped model uses videos in-class, instead of before class, as is the case for the traditional model. This study uses mixed-method research with a case study for one university course. The results indicate that there is a significant difference in SRL and TPACK and that the videos for flipped courses are diverse, rich, and attract students’ attention and interest. Watching technology videos is more efficient in class than watching them out of class. Students work together as a learning community to complete tasks, and the instructor uses technology videos to explain the topics, joins student discussion, and uses multiple strategies and abundant videos to demonstrate the relevance of different thematic units in this course. Using videos in flipped classrooms is beneficial to the university instructor’s TPACK.
References
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Aldhafeeri, F. M. (2015). Blended learning in higher education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, & T. C. Reeves (Eds.), The international handbook of e-learning, Volume 2: Implementation and case studies (pp. 121–132). Routledge.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Artino, A. R., Jr., & Jones, K. D., II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006
Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
Beege, M., Krieglstein, F., & Arnold, C. (2022). How instructors influence learning with instructional videos: The importance of professional appearance and communication. Computers & Education, 185, 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104531
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Bouwmeester, R. A. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., van den Berg, I. E. T., ten Cate, O. T. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Westerveld, H. E. (2019). Flipping the medical classroom: Effect on workload, interactivity, motivation and retention of knowledge. Computers & Education, 139, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.002
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Chan, T. W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20 years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00385.x
Chang, Y., Jang, S.-J., & Chen, Y.-H. (2015). Assessing university students’ perceptions of their physics instructors’ TPACK development in two contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12188
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is flip enough? Or should we use the flipped model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Foot, H., & Howe, C. (1998). The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning. In K. J. Topping & S. W. Ehly (Eds.), Peer-assisted learning (pp. 27–43). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gorissen, P., Van Bruggen, J., & Jochems, W. (2012). Students and recorded lectures: Survey on current use and demands for higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17299
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer Publishing.Wikipedia
Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.027
He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001
Hong, H. Y., Chang, Y. H., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Fostering a collaborative and creative climate in a college class through idea-centered knowledge-building. Instructional Science, 42(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9289-y
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.009
Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
Jang, S.-J. (2018). Flipped classrooms on university students’ perceptions of instructors’ TPACK. In R. V. Nata (Ed.), Progress in Education (Vol. 53, pp. 107–134). Nova Science Publishers.
Jang, S.-J. (2021). A study of co-teaching and co-design flipped classes on the university science instructor’s TPACK. In R. V. Nata (Ed.), Progress in Education (Vol. 66, pp. 35–67). Nova Science Publishers.
Jang, S.-J., & Chang, Y. (2016). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese university physics instructors. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2054
Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2013). Development of an instrument to assess university students’ perceptions of their science instructors’ TPACK. Journal of Modern Education Review, 3(10), 771–783.
Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2016). Exploring the development of pre-service teachers’ ICT-TPACK using a cognitive stimulation tool. In E. Railean (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Learning Theory and Design in Modern Education (pp. 380–404). IGI Global.
Kang, M., Heo, H., Jo, I. H., Shin, J., & Seo, J. (2010). Developing an educational performance indicator for new millennium learners. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782567
Kang, H., & Es, V. E. A. (2019). Articulating design principles for productive use of video in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118761361
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kiteley, R. J., & Ormrod, G. (2009). Towards a team-based, collaborative approach to embedding e-learning within undergraduate nursing programmes. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.01.004
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 102, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
Kuhlmann, S. L., et al. (2024). Students’ active cognitive engagement with instructional videos predicts STEM learning. Computers & Education, 216, 105050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105050
Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Larsen, J. (2015). Adult students’ experiences of a flipped mathematics classroom. Adults Learning Mathematics, 10(1), 50–67. Retrieved from http://www.alm-online.net/images/ALM/journals/alm-ij-volume10-1-june2015.pdf
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12661
Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019). The impact of flipped classrooms on student achievement in engineering education: A meta-analysis of 10 years of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20293
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students' sense of community in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 115, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
Maciejewski, W. (2016). Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(4), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw018
Munira, M. T., Baroutian, S., Young, B. R., & Carter, S. (2018). Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001
Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). Is online life a breeze? A case study for promoting synchronous learning in a blended graduate course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 307–323. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no3/park.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Rehman, R., & Fatima, S. S. (2021). An innovation in flipped classroom: A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3123
Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL) past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09463-0
Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142–152. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.142
Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge forum (advances beyond CSILE). Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 23–28. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/127/111
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Seo, K., et al. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
Vieira, I., Lopes, A. P., & Soares, F. (2014). The potential benefits of using videos in higher education. In Proceedings of EDULEARN14 Conference (pp. 750–756). IATED Publications. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4853
Shih, C.-L., & Chuang, H.-H. (2013). The development and validation of an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of faculty knowledge in technology-supported class environments. Computers & Education, 63, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.021
Shih, H. J., & Huang, S. C. (2019). College students’ metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 755–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1590420Taylor & Francis Online+1Taylor & Francis Online+1
Sletten, S. R. (2015). Investigating self-regulated learning strategies in the flipped classroom. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 497–501). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2020). The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789ResearchGate
Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students' success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.003ResearchGate
Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Tseng, S.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Students' self-regulated learning, online information evaluative standards and online academic searching strategies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.242AJET+1National Taiwan Normal University+1
Wang, F. H. (2019). On the relationships between behaviors and achievement in technology-mediated flipped classrooms: A two-phase online behavioral PLS-SEM model. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103653
Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Weng, X., Ng, O., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). Competency development of pre-service teachers during video-based learning: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 199, Article 104790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104790ResearchGate+1ScienceDirect+1
Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2003). Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00041-3ResearchGate
Wu, S. J., Han, J., Sun, F. R., Wan, R. G., & Zhao, Y. Q. (2021). An integrated model for exploring college students’ engagement and competence development in flipped learning using partial least squares path modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1879735
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal of Advanced Life Sciences, 6(3/4), 122–135.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Pedagogical and Teacher Professional Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.